DIGITALIZATION OF THE COURT AS AN EFFORT TO REALIZE THE PRINCIPLES OF SIMPLE, FAST, AND LOW-COST COURT PROCEDURES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v21i1.448Keywords:
Digitalization of Justice, E-Court, E-Litigation, Principles of Justice, Access to JusticeAbstract
The development of information technology has driven a transformation in the Indonesian justice system through the implementation of digitalization of judicial services. This study aims to analyze the extent of digitalization of the judiciary, particularly through the implementation of digitalization.e-Court And e-Litigation, capable of realizing the principles of simple, fast, and low-cost justice as mandated by Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. The research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory, conceptual, and analytical approach. Data were obtained from laws and regulations, court decisions, and relevant scientific literature. The results of the study indicate that the digitalization of justice has made a significant contribution to the efficiency of case administration, acceleration of trial processes, reduction of transportation and administrative costs, and increased public access to judicial services. However, its implementation still faces various obstacles, including the digital infrastructure gap, low technological literacy among some members of the public, and challenges related to security and personal data protection. Therefore, strengthening regulations, increasing human resource capacity, and equalizing technological infrastructure are needed to support the realization of an effective, inclusive, and equitable digital justice system.
Downloads
References
Ahmadi Ahmadi, et al. “Transformasi Digital Dalam Administrasi Perkara Di Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Mataram.” Jurnal Pengabdian Kolaborasi dan Inovasi IPTEKS 3.6 (2025).
Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja. “Perkembangan Regulasi Dan Pelaksanaan Persidangan online di indonesia dan amerika serikat selama pandemi covid-19.” Crepido 2.1 (2020).
Erie Hariyanto, and Sundusiyah Sundusiyah. “Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Tentang E-Court Untuk Mewujudkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Di Pengadilan Agama Pamekasan.” Arena Hukum 15.3 (2022).
Fadila Hilma Mawaddah, and Abdul Haris. "Implementasi layanan peradilan bagi penyandang disabilitas perspektif teori efektivitas hukum Soerjono Soekanto." Sakina: Journal of Family Studies 6.2 (2022).
Femilya, Erfaniah Zuhriah Herviani, and Raden Cecep Lukman Yasin. "Pertimbangan hakim dalam pemberian dispensasi nikah perspektif teori sistem hukum Lawrence M. Friedman di Pengadilan Agama Malang." Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial Dan Sains 11.1 (2022).
Hasanuddin, Hasanuddin, and Summa Summa. "Transformasi Digital Peradilan Agama melalui e-Court Analisis Efisiensi dan Tantangan Implementasi." At-Tasyrih: jurnal pendidikan dan hukum Islam 11.2 (2025).
Khotib Iqbal Hidayat, Aris Priyadi, and Elly Kristiani Purwendah. "Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) dan Konvensional." Batulis Civil Law Review 1.1 (2020).
Muhammad Zainuddin, and Aisyah Dinda Karina. “Penggunaan metode yuridis normatif dalam membuktikan kebenaran pada penelitian hukum.” Smart Law Journal 2.2 (2023).
Niswan Harefa, Bertrand Silverius Sitohang, and Mancur Sinaga. “Analisis Dampak Digitalisasi Peradilan Terhadap Akses Keadilan Dan Prinsip Peradilan Yang Adil Bagi Pencari Keadilan.” Jurnal Hukum Justice (2026).
Dahlan, Ninik Ayuhandika. "Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Peran Ahli Dalam Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Indonesia." Riau Law Journal 9.2 (2025)
Satrio Abdillah, and Hamanda Hadi Saputra. "Urgensi Regulasi Cyber Notary Dalam Mendukung Kepastian Hukum Di Era Digital." Lex Stricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4.1 (2025).
Shalsya Malika Yunus, and Ana Riana. "Transformasi Digital Layanan Publik: Studi Sosiologis Implementasi E-Litigasi dalam Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Klaten." Journal of Social Movements 2.1 (2025).
Simanungkalit, Irfandy H., and Debora Debora. "Implementasi E-Court Sebagai Upaya Modernisasi Administrasi Peradilan Di Indonesia." PALAR (Pakuan Law review) 10.4 (2024).
Siti Fatimah. “Telaah Komparatif Antara Peradilan Konvensional dan E-Court dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa.” YUDHISTIRA: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan 2.1 (2024).
Suryanto, M. H., F. T. Arresti, and A. Makky. “No Viral No Justice Perspektif Teori Efektivitas Hukum Soerjono Soekanto.” Widya Yuridika 7.3 (2024).
Viny Elvia, M. Fachri Adnan, and Afriva Khaidir. "Peran Teknologi dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance: Perspektif Teori Administrasi Publik." Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development 5.1 (2025).
Yulianti, Nanda Dwi, and Winda Sari Pratiwi Panjaitan. “Peran Advokat Dalam Mewujudkan Access To Justice Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice (Studi Pada Ambarastha Lawfirm &Attorney).” Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) 4.6 (2026).
Zulfadin Syarif. “Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, Dan Biaya Ringan Dalam Ketentuan Persidangan Hybrid Perkara Perdata.” Collegium Studiosum Journal 7.1 (2024).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 PRANATA HUKUM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Pranata Journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, distribute, adapt, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as appropriate credit is given and derivative works are licensed under the same terms.
