ANALYSIS OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN GENERAL ELECTION RESULT DISPUTE CASES (STUDY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULING NUMBER 1/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024 AND 2/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v19i2.348Keywords:
Court Constitution, Election Results Dispute General, Verdict Court ConstitutionAbstract
This study serve analysis deep about authority Court Constitution (MK) in handle case The General Election Results Dispute (PHPU) is based on two decisions related , ie Court Constitution Numbers 1/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024 and 2/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024. Research methods use approach descriptive analytical with collect primary data from Constitutional Court decisions and secondary data from literature related . Analysis results show that the Constitutional Court uses his authority with careful and thorough in assess the selection process general and results , as well ensure obedience to provision constitution and applicable laws. Second decision the give description about how the Constitutional Court considers evidence and arguments submitted by the parties to the dispute , as well as drop decisions based on principle sovereignty law and democracy . Implications from the Constitutional Court's decision against enforcement democracy and sovereignty law is very important in strengthen the integrity of the political process and safeguarding balance power between state institutions . In conclusion , handling PHPU case by MK plays vital role in guard stability politics , strengthen democracy , and ensuring obedience to rule law in system Indonesian politics.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 PRANATA HUKUM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.