ANALYSIS OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN GENERAL ELECTION RESULT DISPUTE CASES (STUDY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULING NUMBER 1/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024 AND 2/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024)

Authors

  • Dora Mustika Universitas Lampung
  • Dani UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • sayyidah sekar dewi kulsum Universitas Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v19i2.348

Keywords:

Court Constitution, Election Results Dispute General, Verdict Court Constitution

Abstract

This study serve analysis deep about authority Court Constitution (MK) in handle case The General Election Results Dispute (PHPU) is based on two decisions related , ie Court Constitution Numbers 1/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024 and 2/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024. Research methods use approach descriptive analytical with collect primary data from Constitutional Court decisions and secondary data from literature related . Analysis results show that the Constitutional Court uses his authority with careful and thorough in assess the selection process general and results , as well ensure obedience to provision constitution and applicable laws. Second decision the give description about how the Constitutional Court considers evidence and arguments submitted by the parties to the dispute , as well as drop decisions based on principle sovereignty law and democracy . Implications from the Constitutional Court's decision against enforcement democracy and sovereignty law is very important in strengthen the integrity of the political process and safeguarding balance power between state institutions . In conclusion , handling PHPU case by MK plays vital role in guard stability politics , strengthen democracy , and ensuring obedience to rule law in system Indonesian politics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dora Mustika, Universitas Lampung

Faculty of Law

Dani, UIN Raden Intan Lampung

Faculty of Sharia

sayyidah sekar dewi kulsum, Universitas Lampung

Faculty of Law

Downloads

Published

2024-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles