VIOLATIONS, POLITICS, AND THE APPLICABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: IS INTERNATIONAL LAW DEAD?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v21i1.444Keywords:
International Law, Legal Validity, Normative Theory, Hans Kelsen, Politics of International Law, IndonesiaAbstract
The contemporary of international relations are increasingly marked by various violations and instances of non-compliance with international law, particularly by powerful states. This phenomenon has given rise to the perception that international law has lost its binding force or is no longer relevant. This article addresses two main issues: whether violations and non-compliance can be understood as signs of the “death” of international law from the perspective of Hans Kelsen’s theory of norms, and how the political nature of international law affects its applicability and function, particularly for Indonesia. This study employs a normative legal research method with a conceptual and analytical approach. The analysis is conducted using Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law as the primary framework, particularly regarding the distinction between fact (sein) and norm (sollen) as well as the concept of legal validity, which is then supplemented by critical and constructivist perspectives on the relationship between law, politics, and power. The research findings indicate that violations do not signify the absence or demise of international law. On the contrary of that, violations actually presuppose the existence of the violated norm and thus affirm the validity of international law as a normative order. Furthermore, the political nature of international law does not negate its legal character; rather, it shapes international law as a normative instrument used to legitimize, limit, and direct the exercise of power within the international community. For Indonesia, international law remains a vital instrument for advancing national interests and building legitimacy within a global order that is not entirely equitable.
Downloads
References
Bersier Ladavac, Nicoletta. “Sein and Sollen, ‘Is’ and ‘Ought’ and the Problem of Normativity in Hans Kelsen,” 29–43, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18929-7_3.
Bothe, Michael. “Compliance in International Law.” In International Law. Oxford University Press, 2020. doi:10.1093/obo/9780199796953-0213.
Bram, Deni. “Pertanggungjawaban Negara Terhadap Pencemaran Lingkungan Transnasional.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 18, no. 2 (2011): 193–211. doi:10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss2.art3.
Bulygin, Eugenio. “An Antimony in Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law*.” Ratio Juris 3, no. 1 (March 2, 1990): 29–45. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1990.tb00049.x.
D’Amato, Anthony. “Evolution of International Law: Two Thresholds, Maybe a Third.” In AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report, Vol. FS-09-03, 2009.
Fassbender, Bardo. “The State’s Unabandoned Claim to Be the Center of the Legal Universe.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16, no. 4 (December 31, 2018): 1207–14. doi:10.1093/icon/moy098.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. “‘Gods Would Be Needed…’: American Empire and the Rule of (International) Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 16, no. 3 (September 30, 2003): 429–66. doi:10.1017/S0922156503001237.
Gheana, Syifa. “Pertanggungjawaban Indonesia dalam Menangani Pencemaran Asap Lintas Batas Ditinjau dari Asean Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution (Aathp).” Litra: Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Tata Ruang, Dan Agraria 2, no. 2 (April 30, 2023): 170–88. doi:10.23920/litra.v2i2.1186.
Goldsmith, Jack, and Daryl Levinson. “Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law.” Harvard Law Review, 2009.
Guzman, Andrew T. “A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law.” California Law Review, 2002. doi:10.2307/3481436.
Hakimi, Monica, and Jacob Katz Cogan. “The Two Codes on the Use of Force.” European Journal of International Law 27, no. 2 (May 26, 2016): 257–91. doi:10.1093/ejil/chw015.
Howse, Robert, and Ruti Teitel. “Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters.” Global Policy 1, no. 2 (May 7, 2010): 127–36. doi:10.1111/j.1758-5899.2010.00035.x.
Keating, Vincent Charles. “Membership Has Its Privileges: Targeted Killing Norms and the Firewall of International Society.” International Studies Quarterly 66, no. 3 (July 18, 2022). doi:10.1093/isq/sqac040.
Kelsen, Hans. “On the Basic Norm.” California Law Review 47, no. 1 (1959). doi:10.2307/3478775.
———. “Pure Theory of Law (1934),” 1967.
Koskenniemi, Martti. “Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law.” European Journal of International Relations 15, no. 3 (2009). doi:10.1177/1354066109338229.
———. “The Politics of International Law-20 Years Later.” The European Journal of International Law 20, no. 1 (2009): 7–19. doi:10.1093/ejil/chp006.
Latipulhayat, Atip. Hukum Internasional: Sumber-Sumber Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.
Leben, C. “Hans Kelsen and the Advancement of International Law.” European Journal of International Law 9, no. 2 (January 1, 1998): 287–305. doi:10.1093/ejil/9.2.287.
Lesch, Max, and Nina Reiners. “Informal Human Rights Law-Making: How Treaty Bodies Use ‘General Comments’ to Develop International Law.” Global Constitutionalism 12, no. 2 (July 7, 2023): 378–401. doi:10.1017/S2045381723000023.
Lindroos, A. “Dispelling the Chimera of ‘Self-Contained Regimes’ International Law and the WTO.” European Journal of International Law 16, no. 5 (November 1, 2005): 857–77. doi:10.1093/ejil/chi148.
Muhammadin, Fajri Matahati. “Can International Law Be Enforced Towards its Subjects Within The International Legal Order?” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 21, no. 2 (April 2014): 175–202. doi:10.20885/iustum.vol21.iss2.art2.
Murphy, Liam. “Law Beyond the State: Some Philosophical Questions.” European Journal of International Law 28, no. 1 (February 1, 2017): 203–32. doi:10.1093/ejil/chx004.
Ohlin, J. D. “Nash Equilibrium and International Law.” European Journal of International Law 23, no. 4 (November 1, 2012): 915–40. doi:10.1093/ejil/chs060.
Paine, Joshua. “Kelsen, Legal Normativity, and Formal Justice in International Relations.” Leiden Journal of International Law 26, no. 4 (December 8, 2013): 1037–53. doi:10.1017/S092215651300054X.
Paulson, Stanley L. “Hans Kelsen’s Earliest Legal Theory: Critical Constructivism.” The Modern Law Review 59, no. 6 (November 18, 1996): 797–812. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1996.tb02695.x.
Pavel, Carmen E. “The Rule Of Law And The Limits Of Anarchy.” Legal Theory 27, no. 1 (March 4, 2021): 70–95. doi:10.1017/S1352325221000045.
Payne, Rodger A. “Persuasion, Frames and Norm Construction.” European Journal of International Relations 7, no. 1 (March 1, 2001): 37–61. doi:10.1177/1354066101007001002.
Percy, Sarah V., and Wayne Sandholtz. “Why Norms Rarely Die.” European Journal of International Relations 28, no. 4 (December 21, 2022): 934–54. doi:10.1177/13540661221126018.
Posner, Eric A., and Alan O. Sykes. “Efficient Breach of International Law: Optimal Remedies, ‘Legalized Noncompliance,’ and Related Issues.” Michigan Law Review 110, no. 2 (2011). doi:10.2139/ssrn.1780463.
Ralph, Jason. “What Should Be Done? Pragmatic Constructivist Ethics and the Responsibility to Protect.” International Organization 72, no. 1 (December 10, 2018): 173–203. doi:10.1017/S0020818317000455.
Reis, Filipe dos, and Janis Grzybowski. “The Matrix Reloaded: Reconstructing the Boundaries between (International) Law and Politics.” Leiden Journal of International Law 34, no. 3 (September 19, 2021): 547–70. doi:10.1017/S0922156521000200.
Reus-Smit, Christian. “The Politics of International Law.” In The Politics of International Law, edited by Christian Reus-Smit, 14–44. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Salcedo, J. A. C. “Reflections on the Existence of a Hierarchy of Norms in International Law.” European Journal of International Law 8, no. 4 (January 1, 1997): 583–95. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a015608.
Scicluna, Nicole. “5. Compliance and Enforcement in International Law.” In The Politics of International Law, 91–118. Oxford University Press, 2021. doi:10.1093/hepl/9780198791201.003.0005.
Shaffer, Gregory. “The New Legal Realist Approach to International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 28, no. 2 (2015): 189–210. doi:10.1017/s0922156515000035.
Stromseth, Jane E. “Law and Force After Iraq: A Transitional Moment.” American Journal of International Law 97, no. 3 (July 27, 2003): 628–42. doi:10.2307/3109848.
Sutch, Peter. “Normative IR Theory and the Legalization of International Politics: The Dictates of Humanity and of the Public Conscience as a Vehicle for Global Justice.” Journal of International Political Theory 8, nos. 1–2 (April 1, 2012): 1–24. doi:10.3366/jipt.2012.0023.
Trivisonno, Alexandre Travessoni Gomes. “A Teoria Da Estrutura Hipotética Das Normas Jurídicas de Kelsen: Características, Evolução e Balanço de Sua Importância.” Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos, no. 121 (2020). doi:10.9732/2020.V121.773.
Troper, Michel. “The Fact and the Law,” 22–37, 1990. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7875-2_3.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Are Sovereigns Entitled to the Benefit of the International Rule of Law?” European Journal of International Law 22, no. 2 (May 2011): 315–43. doi:10.1093/ejil/chr031.
Welsh, Jennifer M. “Norm Robustness and the Responsibility to Protect.” Journal of Global Security Studies 4, no. 1 (January 1, 2019): 53–72. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogy045.
Zysset, Alain. “Right, Crime, and Court: Toward a Unifying Political Conception of International Law.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 12, no. 4 (December 16, 2018): 677–93. doi:10.1007/s11572-017-9450-9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 PRANATA HUKUM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Pranata Journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, distribute, adapt, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as appropriate credit is given and derivative works are licensed under the same terms.
